Paper profile
Long term outcomes of participants in the PARAMEDIC2 randomised trial of adrenaline in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Haywood KL, Ji C, Quinn T, Nolan JP, Deakin CD, Scomparin C, Lall R, Gates S, Long J, Regan S, Fothergill RT, Pocock H, Rees N, O'Shea L, Perkins GD
Abstract
AIMS: We recently reported early outcomes in patients enrolled in a randomised trial of adrenaline in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the PARAMEDIC2 (Prehospital Assessment of the Role of Adrenaline: Measuring the Effectiveness of Drug Administration in Cardiac Arrest) trial. The purpose of the present paper is to report long-term survival, quality of life, functional and cognitive outcomes at 3, 6 and 12-months. METHODS: PARAMEDIC2 was a pragmatic, individually randomised, double blind, controlled trial with an economic evaluation. Patients were randomised to either adrenaline or placebo. This paper reports results on the modified Rankin Scale scores at 6-months, survival at 6 and 12-months, as well as other cognitive, functional and quality of life outcomes collected at 3 and 6 months (Two Simple Questions, the Mini Mental State Examination, the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline Evaluation for Cardiac Arrest, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - Civilian Version, Short-Form 12-item Health Survey and the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L). RESULTS: 8014 patients were randomised with confirmed trial drug administration. At 6-months, 78 (2.0%) of the patients in the adrenaline group and 58 (1.5%) of patients in the placebo group had a favourable neurological outcome (adjusted odds ratio 1.35 [95% confidence interval: 0.93, 1.97]). 117 (2.9%) patients were alive at 6-months in the adrenaline group compared with 86 (2.2%) in the placebo group (1.43 [1.05, 1.96], reducing to 107 (2.7%) and 80 (2.0%) respectively at 12-months (1.38 [1.00, 1.92]). Measures of 3 and 6-month cognitive, functional and quality of life outcomes were reduced, but there was no strong evidence of differences between groups. CONCLUSION: Adrenaline improved survival through to 12-months follow-up. The study did not find evidence of improvements in favourable neurological outcomes. (ISCRTN 73485024).
Study snapshot
- Setting
- OHCA
- Design
- —
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Domains
- Cognitive, Psychological, Qol
- Keywords
- —
- MeSH
- Cost-Benefit Analysis, Double-Blind Method, Epinephrine, Humans, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires
Citations & exports
Related papers
Long-Term Functional Outcome and Quality of Life Following In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest-A Longitudinal Cohort Study.
Pound GM, Jones D, Eastwood GM et al.
Critical care medicine • 2022
Long-Term Quality of Life After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.
Yonis H, Sørensen KK, Bøggild H et al.
JAMA cardiology • 2023
In-depth assessment of health-related quality of life after in-hospital cardiac arrest.
Schluep M, Endeman H, Gravesteijn BY et al.
Journal of critical care • 2021
[Quality of life after in-hospital cardiac arrest : An 11-year experience from an university center].
Treml B, Eckhardt C, Oberleitner C et al.
Die Anaesthesiologie • 2024